What is the standard form of interpreting regarding voice usage?

The standard form of interpreting regarding voice usage involves employing the first-person voice. This method helps create a direct and immediate connection between the interpreter and the participants in the conversation. By using the first person, interpreters effectively convey the speaker’s message as if it were being delivered by the speaker themselves, which enhances clarity and allows for a more authentic representation of the original content.

Using the first person also helps to eliminate ambiguity about the roles and perspectives in the dialogue, making it easier for all parties involved to understand who is speaking and what is being communicated. This approach aligns closely with the principles of interpretation that prioritize accuracy and immediacy, reinforcing the interpreter's role as a direct conduit for the message rather than as a separate entity relaying information.

The other choices do not align with the practiced standards of voice usage in interpreting. For instance, third-person voice can create distance or confusion about who is speaking, while a formal tone may not be suitable for every context, potentially hindering the intended message's emotional impact or urgency. Neutral voice, while important for maintaining impartiality, does not capture the directness and immediacy that first-person usage provides.