Is it true that the interpreter in mental health appointments should not give personal opinions?

In mental health appointments, interpreters are expected to adhere to a strict code of ethics that prioritizes neutrality and professionalism. This code dictates that interpreters should not interject personal opinions, as their role is to facilitate communication between the client and the mental health professional without adding their own perspective.

When interpreters offer personal opinions, it can lead to a breach of trust, create confusion, or influence the dynamics of the conversation. The goal is to ensure that the client's voice is accurately represented and that they feel heard without the interpreter's biases impacting the exchange.

Therefore, understanding the critical importance of this neutral role in a mental health context clarifies that personal opinions should indeed be withheld, reinforcing the professionalism and objectivity that are essential in these sensitive environments.